Client: Personal Project
Project Overview:
In 2015, I embarked on a personal project to explore the then-emerging capabilities of Google’s Physical Web and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons. This experiment focused on using a BLE beacon, cleverly embedded within a keychain, to broadcast a URL and trigger proximity-based interactions. While I experimented with various beacon brands, including Estimote, the primary goal was to investigate practical use cases for this technology in real-world marketing and communication scenarios. Although Google Chrome has since discontinued support for the Physical Web, this project provided invaluable hands-on experience and insights into the early potential – and limitations – of BLE beacon technology and Google’s Eddystone protocol.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6097a/6097a7d8f8edaf6566ad2d94e205a18c0c489f04" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/721ff/721ffc4b3ab7f32c478fbe463de2dfe6213756f6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af779/af7793c5d6e86e3c72d2838dfa4210ae00c5beb6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba69d/ba69de8e4dde70d5bbf2738fd14850e3ff9329b9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eab0/4eab05404faed4f5bc6ae05abe9893df1d4328d2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1a12/a1a122ff50dce6edce4be5329cd9e6743713aad4" alt=""
Challenge:
The core challenge lay in navigating the largely uncharted territory of the Physical Web and BLE beacons. The objective was to move beyond theoretical possibilities and identify tangible applications that could deliver real value to businesses and consumers. This involved grappling with practical limitations, such as the relatively short range of BLE signals, the requirement for users to have Bluetooth enabled on their devices, and the experimental nature of Google’s Physical Web platform (utilizing the Eddystone protocol), which was still in its early stages of development.
Solution:
The technical solution centered around configuring a compact BLE beacon, small enough to be discreetly attached to a keychain, to broadcast a pre-defined URL using the Physical Web protocol (powered by Eddystone). To clarify, the Physical Web was an open-source initiative by Google to enable interactions with “smart objects” in the real world. Eddystone was the specific Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocol, also developed by Google, that allowed beacons to broadcast URLs and other data. My keychain project utilized the Eddystone-URL frame type, which is specifically designed for broadcasting web addresses. This setup allowed any compatible device – primarily Android phones with Bluetooth enabled and, at the time, the Chrome browser with Physical Web support activated – to receive a notification and directly access the designated URL when within range of the beacon’s signal.
Use Case Exploration
I brainstormed and explored a variety of potential use cases, focusing on how this technology could bridge the gap between the physical and digital worlds. Key concepts included:
- Interactive Signage: Combining traditional physical signage with BLE beacons to create dynamic, interactive experiences. For instance, a sign might display a message like, “Look for an alert on your phone,” prompting users to check their devices. The beacon would then trigger a notification containing additional information, a special offer, a link to a relevant website, or even a call to action.
- Proximity Based Notification of Presence: An alert would trigger when an individual with the configured keychain entered a room.
The Keychain Experiment: A Personal Broadcast
2.0 Pro Experimental. Lacks access to real-time info and some Gemini features.
Excellent additions! These details provide a much clearer picture of how you used the keychain and the specific outcomes you observed. The personalized notification (“Jay Benjamin is Here 🤘”) and the retargeting capabilities add a layer of sophistication to the project. The real-time observation at the High Point Furniture Market is a fantastic anecdote that demonstrates the practical application and your data-driven approach.
Let’s integrate these details into the “Solution” section (specifically, “The Keychain Experiment”) and the “Results and Reflection” section.
Here’s the revised text:
(Within the “Solution” section, replacing the existing “The Keychain Experiment” paragraph):
The Keychain Experiment: A Personalized Broadcast
To test the technology’s capabilities and limitations in a real-world setting, I carried the beacon-equipped keychain with me on a daily basis. This wasn’t just a generic URL broadcast; I configured the beacon to transmit a link to a specific landing page I created for each context or meeting. Furthermore, the notification displayed to users wasn’t a generic message; it was customized to be personal and attention-grabbing, typically reading: “Jay Benjamin is Here 🤘” followed by a link to the relevant landing page.
This personal experiment unexpectedly yielded a memorable demonstration of the technology’s potential. On several occasions, individuals at meetings recognized me before any formal introductions, having received the notification on their phones. This firsthand experience highlighted both the surprising effectiveness and the potential privacy considerations associated with proximity-based notifications. It also provided a practical way to initiate a digital interaction with individuals in a physical setting.
Technology:
- BLE Beacons (including Estimote): Utilized for their small form factor, ease of configuration, and compatibility with the Physical Web. Estimote was one brand among several explored.
- Google’s Physical Web (using Eddystone): An open-source project by Google that aimed to enable interactions with physical objects via URLs broadcast over Bluetooth Low Energy using the Eddystone protocol. The Physical Web provided the conceptual framework, while Eddystone provided the technical means to broadcast URLs.
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE): The underlying wireless communication technology that allows beacons to transmit data over short distances with minimal power consumption.
Results and Reflection:
Although Google ultimately discontinued support for the Physical Web in Chrome, this hands-on experiment with the keychain provided invaluable experience with BLE beacon technology and its potential applications in marketing, communication, and user engagement. It vividly demonstrated the power of proximity-based interactions to create unique and, at times, surprisingly personal user experiences, as evidenced by the instances where people recognized me solely from the keychain’s broadcast.
Beyond the immediate notification, this setup also allowed for subsequent digital engagement. By directing users to a custom landing page, I could track interactions and even implement retargeting campaigns using cookies and tracking tags. This demonstrated the potential for integrating the Physical Web into a broader marketing strategy. One particularly insightful application of this technology occurred during the High Point Furniture Market in High Point, NC. I carried the beacon-equipped keychain throughout the event, and using analytics on the custom landing page, I was able to observe, in real-time, as attendees interacted with the page after receiving the proximity-based notification. This provided immediate feedback on the reach and effectiveness of the broadcast and highlighted the potential for gathering valuable data on user engagement in a physical environment.
The project also underscored the importance of carefully considering user privacy implications and the inherent challenges of relying on specific platform support (in this case, Google Chrome) for the success of emerging technologies. This early exploration of BLE technology and the Eddystone protocol served as a valuable learning experience, providing foundational knowledge that has informed subsequent projects and solidified an understanding of the evolving potential of proximity-based interactions in various contexts.
Beyond my personal keychain experiment, the Physical Web and Eddystone held promise for a range of other applications, some of which saw limited real-world deployment before the technology’s decline:
- Interactive Museum Exhibits: Beacons placed near exhibits could have provided visitors with additional information, audio guides, or interactive content on their phones, triggered by their proximity. This would have eliminated the need for dedicated museum apps.
- Smart Retail: Retailers could have used beacons to send targeted offers, product information, or loyalty program details to shoppers as they browsed specific sections of a store. This was envisioned as a way to enhance the in-store shopping experience and drive sales.
- Public Transportation: As mentioned earlier, bus stops or train stations could have broadcast real-time schedule information, service updates, or even platform directions directly to passengers’ phones.
- Smart City Applications: Beacons could have been used to provide information about points of interest, public services, or even emergency alerts to citizens as they moved through a city.
- Event Engagement: Conferences or trade shows could have used beacons to provide attendees with schedules, speaker information, networking opportunities, or interactive maps.
- Inventory Management: Although less directly related to the Physical Web’s focus on user-facing interactions, Eddystone’s other frame types (beyond Eddystone-URL) could have been used for tracking assets and inventory within a warehouse or other facility.
While the potential benefits were intriguing, the inherent risk of notification overload and potential for misuse became readily apparent. Imagine a trip to a large retailer like Walmart: if every product or department were broadcasting its own URL via the Physical Web, users’ phones would be bombarded with a constant stream of unwanted notifications. This “spammy” experience would quickly become annoying and likely lead users to disable the feature altogether, defeating the purpose of the technology. This highlights a crucial lesson: the user experience must be paramount. Any proximity-based technology needs to be carefully designed to provide genuine value and avoid overwhelming the user with irrelevant information.
The key takeaway from the Physical Web, despite its limited lifespan, is the enduring concept of bridging the physical and digital worlds through context-aware, proximity-based interactions. While the specific implementation via broadcast URLs and Chrome notifications didn’t gain widespread traction, the underlying principles continue to be relevant in other technologies, such as:
- QR Codes: Offer a more controlled and user-initiated way to access digital content from physical objects.
- NFC (Near Field Communication): Used for contactless payments, access control, and data transfer, often requiring a deliberate tap.
- Location-Based Services (using GPS and Wi-Fi): Provide broader location awareness, though often less precise than BLE beacons.
- Augmented Reality (AR): Overlays digital information onto the real world, often using visual markers or location data.
My keychain experiment, while a small-scale exploration, provided a tangible glimpse into the potential – and the potential pitfalls – of this broader vision of connected physical spaces. It reinforced the importance of user experience, privacy, the need for a robust and sustainable technological foundation, and most importantly, a user-controlled experience, for any proximity-based interaction system.